MSI MS-16JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star PE62 8RC
MotherboardMSI MS-16JF  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180601
Uptime28.3 Days
Run DateJan 08 '23 at 13:21
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 207
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 443
50% 395 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1221) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2802
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Lighting 32
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 32.5
26% 32 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 20.8
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GJ 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 98 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 467
Write 328
Mixed 332
SusWrite 102
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 29.6
120% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 185
161% 237 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-012.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.6
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.5
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16JF Builds (Compare 594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback