Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory10.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 05:10
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 95
2-Core 159
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 265
34% 260 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
AMD(1002 0C35) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.10.21.05
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 20.6
0% 10.1 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 17.5
11% 12.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.1% Poor
Read 67.7
Write 49.8
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 38.3
13% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 13.4
75% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 13.7
DQ Mixed 20.3
16% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 94GB
85GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.1% Below average
Read 63
Write 66.9
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 31.1
13% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 31.8
99% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 32.4
DQ Mixed 33.1
25% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 14GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 13312 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 37.3
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 28.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback