Today's hottest deals

Micro UM690

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive489% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro UM690  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BFC
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 23:57
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 74.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 336
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 1,043
105% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,368
85% 1,368 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 1681) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 70.3
35% 55.6 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 56
37% 42.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHPP41-2000GM 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51060A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2726 2896 3082 3806 3796 3558 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
489% Outstanding
Read 3,969
Write 3,227
Mixed 2,983
SusWrite 3,311
758% 3,372 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 85.7
286% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 786
DQ Mixed 935
685% 899 MB/s
Poor: 301%
This bench: 489%
Great: 641%
Seagate One Touch HDD 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 129
Mixed 70.9
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
211% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-5200S3838A16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 40
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 32.8
106% 36.9 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 114%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UM690 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Micro UM690

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback