Acer Nitro AN17-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive390% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN17-41  (all builds)
MotherboardRB Spacia_PEH
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 09:56
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 75.3
1-Core 168
2-Core 307
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,058
97% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,430
88% 1,430 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1677) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.21
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 42.9
Reflection 47.8
Parallax 79.6
35% 56.8 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 44
Splatting 52.9
35% 40.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B07 1TB
803GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7402Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2901 2983 2947 2599 1636 1623 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
390% Outstanding
Read 2,728
Write 3,083
Mixed 2,830
SusWrite 2,448
626% 2,772 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 87.8
281% 95.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 826
DQ Mixed 975
727% 971 MB/s
Poor: 230%
This bench: 390%
Great: 442%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 38.7
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 29.3
102% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 116%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 0P 5R 6G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 22% 59 333 109 165 17.3" 1280 720 AUO9AA0
Typical Nitro AN17-41 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Nitro AN17-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback