PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7693 |
Motherboard | MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141216 |
Uptime | 3.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 15 '23 at 13:22 |
Run Duration | 231 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 527.56
|
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 232 207 230 203 236 MB/s
|
73.9%
Very good
|
|||
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 107 106 107 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
323GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 134 134 134 133 131 MB/s
|
80.2%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
29GB free
Firmware: 12.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 54 49 43 63 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
354GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 960x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 412x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 264x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 166x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 149x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 141x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $289 |