Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2403 0 38 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Memory 36.4 1-Core 31.3 2-Core 62.3 26% 43.3 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 249 28% 218 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 633GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 98 115 97 95 104 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.2% Poor	Read 112 Write 113 Mixed 108 SusWrite 99.8 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 9.7 33% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 146 108% 143 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 128%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 86 79 81 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 76 Write 76.5 Mixed 52 SusWrite 81.1 52% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9965516-031.A00LF 019804B3 9965516-129.A00LF 019804B3 9965516-129.A00LF 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.3% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 14.3 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.9 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 220 18% 220 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2470 v21stBench 56%, 50 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2420 01stBench 54%, 155 samples	8x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2420 v21stBench 54%, 81 samples	4x

SSD
SNV2S250G 250GBKingstonBench 198%, 2,782 samples	5x
MP600 500GBForceBench 261%, 13,280 samples	4x
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x

RAM
M393B1G70QH0-YK0 00CE00B300CE M393B1G70QH0-YK0 00CE00B300CE M393B2G70DB0-YK0 002C04B3002C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4D1 48GBUnknownBench 40%, 6 samples	5x
D3-64WT124SLW-1AD 6x31.8GBUnknownBench 80%, 3 samples	3x
9965516-031.A00LF 019804B3 9965516-129.A00LF 019804B3 9965516-129.A00LF 32GBUnknownBench 38%, 4 samples	3x

Value: 123% - Outstanding

Total price: $200