Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 18:50
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 265
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 780
75% 619 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$651
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 330
Reflection 286
Parallax 139
269% 251 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 143
Splatting 143
117% 143 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 194%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
194GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 421 417 410 423 421 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 425
Mixed 379
SusWrite 418
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 53.9
171% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 213
153% 195 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 936 903 567 681 725 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,399
Write 1,663
Mixed 1,568
SusWrite 821
308% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 66.6
215% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 1030
DQ Mixed 1,099
836% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 224%
Great: 298%
Seagate Expansion Desk 14TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 154 162 160 154 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 146
Write 149
Mixed 163
SusWrite 156
35% 153 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 1.5
36% 9.93 MB/s
DQ Read 5.2
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 1.7
3% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
431GB free
Firmware: ML6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 108 112 112 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 100
Write 113
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 110
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 73%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 131 135 136 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 134
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 87%
WD My Book 750GB
76GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 36
Write 37.7
Mixed 29
SusWrite 37.8
48% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 22%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
818GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 111 109 110 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 111
Write 116
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 110
142% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
217% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 98%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
847GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 82 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 90.7
Write 89.2
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 81.1
111% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
3TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 109 108 110 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65% Good
Read 125
Write 114
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 109
146% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.8
284% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 65%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 40.6
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 36.1
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $945
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback