bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory100GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 100GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory94.2 GB free of 100 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '23 at 03:06
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 74F3 24-Core
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 24.3
1-Core 95
2-Core 200
52% 106 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 564
59% 471 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 162 128 157 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 501
Write 146
Mixed 256
SusWrite 149
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 21.8
76% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 24.7
33% 63.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 773GB
705GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 296 287 298 292 306 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.4% Above average
Read 482
Write 484
Mixed 480
SusWrite 288
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 13.3
44% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 151
114% 152 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 64GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
1024, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
227% Outstanding
MC Read 168
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 66.2
275% 96.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 16.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 291
14% 291 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 227%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback