Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 3,953 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 157 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 562 51% 427 Pts	64-Core 1,149 71% 1,149 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% MSI(1462 8095) 2GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 6 Parallax 6.8 5% 6.37 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 9.3 Splatting 8 6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SC210 2 256GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1L00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 164 160 159 156 158 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.3% Above average	Read 420 Write 312 Mixed 231 SusWrite 169 63% 283 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 17.3 48% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 213 185% 276 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	59.7% Above average	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 18.9 62% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 16.1 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	491x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	482x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	461x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,370x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	490x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	356x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16