Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Blade Shadow Computer (all builds)
Motherboard	Blade ShadowM
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '23 at 23:46
Run Duration	105 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 7543P 32-Core 974 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU1 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 68.1 1-Core 123 2-Core 227 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 576 58% 474 Pts	64-Core 564 35% 564 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 76%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB 1,797 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 457 Write 37.6 Mixed 45.2 SusWrite 39.5 31% 145 MB/s	4K Read 80.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.8 123% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Blade OD8YZULZC7JWL0-RNS 1x16GB 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	94.5% Outstanding	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 36.2 100% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.6 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 28.2 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 52%

Yacht

GPU
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	298x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	256x
RTX A4500NvidiaBench 146%, 1,594 samples	24x

SSD
HARDDISK 275GBQemuBench 89%, 1,797 samples	571x
HARDDISK 825GBQemuBench 88%, 37 samples	21x
HARDDISK 1.5TBQemuBench 75%, 3 samples	1x

RAM
282DEW7CTQ0QH4-0V7 1x12GBBladeBench 97%, 3 samples	3x
2UUHX2E3U314TS-2WF 1x12GBBladeBench 59%, 3 samples	2x
YN1J8O05X3T5EC-468 1x12GBBladeBench 60%, 2 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16