Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110502
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 18:31
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 133
62% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 385
40% 321 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
XFX(1682 3100) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 19.5
Parallax 18.6
17% 19.5 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 11.6
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 480GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 169 189 197 203 201 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 191
Write 185
Mixed 183
SusWrite 187
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 19.6
63% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 79
DQ Write 43.5
DQ Mixed 59.9
45% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 97%
SSK Storage 1TB
913GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 192 200 202 205 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 274
Write 197
Mixed 210
SusWrite 196
288% 220 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 17.6
1,358% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 36.5
DQ Mixed 31.4
2,412% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 149%
Great: 149%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,082 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback