Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 08:58
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 157
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 263
28% 226 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.7% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 66.9
55% 68.2 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 66.2
55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 430
Write 333
Mixed 238
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 22.8
83% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 98.3
DQ Mixed 145
120% 179 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 200
Write 205
Mixed 83.3
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.6
Write 4
Mixed 6
12% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 100
Write 16
Mixed 4.2
33% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
55% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback