Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Memory 29.5 1-Core 37.4 2-Core 71 26% 46 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 124 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 5A84) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 2.7 2% 2.47 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.1 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 835GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 58 44 49 46 52 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 258 16% 258 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	31x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	22x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	8x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	9x
SATA SSD 240GBKioxia-exceriaBench 71%, 6,527 samples	5x
BX300 480GBCrucial $70Bench 102%, 2,932 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 45 samples	10x
GR1600S3V64L11S/4G 2x4GBUndeBench 28%, 4 samples	2x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	2x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16