Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 248%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 316%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 133%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive426% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 17:58
Run Duration390 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900KF-$401
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 230
2-Core 461
135% 261 Pts
4-Core 924
8-Core 1,808
162% 1,366 Pts
64-Core 3,958
245% 3,958 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Device(7377 1501) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 278
Reflection 350
Parallax 284
227% 304 fps
MRender 322
Gravity 229
Splatting 173
190% 241 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 192%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2232 2068 1372 1368 1354 1433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
426% Outstanding
Read 2,771
Write 2,560
Mixed 1,992
SusWrite 1,638
502% 2,240 MB/s
4K Read 79
4K Write 250
4K Mixed 119
405% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 2413
DQ Write 1,602
DQ Mixed 1,890
1,442% 1,969 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 426%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
165GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,573
Write 2,315
Mixed 1,529
475% 2,139 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 107
362% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,869
DQ Write 1,891
DQ Mixed 1,811
1,380% 1,857 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Hs-ssd-g4000 512G 512GB
399GB free
Firmware: SN08193
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3967 3364 762 786 801 783 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
496% Outstanding
Read 4,311
Write 4,244
Mixed 2,720
SusWrite 1,744
728% 3,255 MB/s
4K Read 77.6
4K Write 272
4K Mixed 117
411% 155 MB/s
DQ Read 2,413
DQ Write 1,658
DQ Mixed 1,309
1,174% 1,793 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 496%
Great: 496%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$94
504GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 486 486 486 486 485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 484
Mixed 453
SusWrite 486
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 70.8
237% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 345
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 140%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
667GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13,346
Write 12,012
Mixed 12,354
2,806% 12,571 MB/s
4K Read 1,045
4K Write 820
4K Mixed 182
2,251% 683 MB/s
DQ Read 2,651
DQ Write 2,093
DQ Mixed 2,309
1,745% 2,351 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
SABRENT 1TB
287GB free
Firmware: RKT343.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2697 2740 1827 1129 1127 1122 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4BL.M8FB1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 43.4
133% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 51.5
SC Mixed 31.8
101% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 126%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 3,687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $939
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback