Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Intel Jasper Lake Client Platform
Motherboard	Intel JSL MRD (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221115
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '23 at 18:09
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5105 1,007 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 34.2 1-Core 53.9 2-Core 137 39% 75.2 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 175 23% 171 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,226 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	2.69% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 3.2 3% 3.57 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 1.8 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.69% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CYX-SSD-S1000 256GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN12015 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 262 195 145 218 244 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 366 Write 374 Mixed 374 SusWrite 218 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 15.6 65% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 244 175% 221 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KINSOTIN8GB2666MHZ 1x8GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.8% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 9 26% 9.03 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.1 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 231 17% 231 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5105IntelBench 37%, 1,007 samples	400x
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	86x
Celeron N5100IntelBench 34%, 996 samples	23x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	423x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	100x

RAM
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 89 samples	90x
2x6GBSamsungBench 41%, 80 samples	78x
KINSOTIN16GB2666MHZ 1x16GBUnknownBench 33%, 512 samples	70x