Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '23 at 19:22
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Memory 6.64
1-Core 26.6
2-Core 44.4
13% 25.9 Pts
4-Core 68.3
8-Core 67.4
9% 67.9 Pts
64-Core 84.8
5% 84.8 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.1
Parallax 1.4
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NS256GSSD340 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 194 230 223 255 216 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 289
Write 248
Mixed 251
SusWrite 218
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 8.8
36% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 94.5
DQ Mixed 35.3
48% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KINSOTIN8GB2666MHZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 436
9% 436 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 0 75 21.5" 1920 1009 ACR06AB SB220Q
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback