PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 (all builds) |
Memory | 14.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120629 |
Uptime | 8 Days |
Run Date | Apr 10 '23 at 04:20 |
Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 78% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
50.7%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2678) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 142 94 127 137 150 MB/s
|
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM KHX1600C9D3/4GX 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
|
42.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 116x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 105x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 41x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 48x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 30x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $526 |