ADD TO PC
BUILD

Pcspecialist Ripper Pro

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	244% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Pcspecialist Ripper Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI
Memory	119.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230210
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '23 at 12:27
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 269 User benchmarks, average bench 95% SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Memory 80.7 1-Core 166 2-Core 321 101% 189 Pts	4-Core 634 8-Core 1,268 112% 951 Pts	64-Core 5,798 359% 5,798 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$750 46,082 User benchmarks, average bench 240% Zotac(19DA 1696) CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.18 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	244% Outstanding	Lighting 356 Reflection 345 Parallax 370 290% 357 fps	MRender 480 Gravity 301 Splatting 216 259% 333 fps
Poor: 208% ↑ This bench: 244% Great: 256%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU020TZ 2TB 1,928 User benchmarks, average bench 332% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,380 Write 3,065 Mixed 1,922 550% 2,456 MB/s	4K Read 70.9 4K Write 186 4K Mixed 93.7 326% 117 MB/s	DQ Read 1,217 DQ Write 1,175 DQ Mixed 961 786% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 187% Great: 452%
2TB PCS 2.5" SSD 2TB 304 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free Firmware: V0718B0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 507 Write 419 Mixed 412 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 25 130% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 36.1 62% 118 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965694-026.B00G 4x31.8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 4 of 8 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	186% Outstanding	MC Read 154 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 41.6 214% 74.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.3 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 35.9 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 186% Great: 186%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback