Pcspecialist Amd Wrx80

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 168%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 312%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive469% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPcspecialist Amd Wrx80  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI
Memory120.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 14:22
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 70.3
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 1,126
96% 825 Pts
64-Core 5,702
353% 5,702 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,035
Palit(1569 2204) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
205% Outstanding
Lighting 303
Reflection 288
Parallax 336
247% 309 fps
MRender 337
Gravity 248
Splatting 182
201% 256 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 205%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3757 3969 3931 3957 3965 3960 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
469% Outstanding
Read 2,157
Write 3631
Mixed 2,246
SusWrite 3,923
680% 2,989 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 85.8
289% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1305
DQ Write 1,086
DQ Mixed 1,206
900% 1,199 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 469%
Great: 492%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4466 4546 4536 4524 4298 3609 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
528% Outstanding
Read 2,602
Write 3,714
Mixed 3,058
SusWrite 4,330
779% 3,426 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 98.4
312% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,446
DQ Write 1351
DQ Mixed 1,392
1,046% 1,396 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 528%
Great: 604%
Seagate ST4000NE001-2MA101 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 196 196 196 196 196 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 107%
Seagate ST4000NE001-2MA101 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 195 196 196 196 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965694-026.B00G 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 19.8
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 21.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Amd Wrx80 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 216%
UFO

System: Pcspecialist Amd Wrx80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 166% - Outstanding Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback