Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	7.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

14 months ago, 8 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$486 2,411 User benchmarks, average bench 114% AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Memory 63.5 1-Core 215 2-Core 429 118% 236 Pts	4-Core 848 8-Core 1,658 148% 1,253 Pts	64-Core 3,716 230% 3,716 Pts
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 125%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU) 8,818 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.02.02 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	7.75% Terrible	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 12.5 Parallax 13.8 6% 11.2 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 7.8 Splatting 20.8 11% 13 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.75% Great: 9%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB 13,304 User benchmarks, average bench 438% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: EIFK31.6 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,257 Write 4,960 Mixed 3506 880% 3,907 MB/s	4K Read 72.9 4K Write 310 4K Mixed 124 434% 169 MB/s	DQ Read 2,038 DQ Write 1,924 DQ Mixed 1,868 1,433% 1,943 MB/s
Poor: 270% Great: 601%
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB 13,304 User benchmarks, average bench 438% 2TB free Firmware: EIFK31.6 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,986 Write 4,672 Mixed 3,526 840% 3,728 MB/s	4K Read 71.5 4K Write 324 4K Mixed 126 441% 174 MB/s	DQ Read 2,139 DQ Write 2,027 DQ Mixed 2,130 1,586% 2099 MB/s
Poor: 270% Great: 601%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B5600Z40 4x31.8GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 142% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	101% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 35.7 MC Mixed 35.2 106% 37.2 GB/s	SC Read 33.9 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 29.6 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 224%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 180%

UFO

Desktop 111%

UFO

Workstation 171%

UFO

SSD
SFYRS1000G 1TBKingstonBench 389%, 17,374 samples	16x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $171Bench 402%, 182,136 samples	12x
P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBCrucial $184Bench 438%, 14,975 samples	10x

RAM
KF552C36-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 134%, 366 samples	16x
TZ/RJ/FL DDR5 6000 C32 2x16GBG.SKILL $97Bench 170%, 9,528 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX 2x16GBCorsairBench 187%, 1,382 samples	9x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $840