Today's hottest deals

Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1862 x 1048 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '23 at 15:25
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 121
56% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 181
22% 171 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 64.2
54% 66.3 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 63.9
54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03210001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 206 237 258 102 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 310
Write 255
Mixed 208
SusWrite 177
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 22.8
74% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 40.5
33% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 111 116 113 121 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 53.3
Write 55.3
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 110
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
162% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-011.A00LF 0080 KF1600DDAD3 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.7% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback