Aierben NA17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel NA17
MotherboardAierben NA17  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 12:27
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 50.6
1-Core 174
2-Core 236
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 669
68% 551 Pts
64-Core 1,200
74% 1,200 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX1060
Device(1B50 551D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1634
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.6% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 40.3
37% 42.5 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 42.1
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 240GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0312A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 10 62 30 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 420
Write 71.7
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 36.7
29% 136 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 19.2
55% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-8GRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 26.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NA17 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Aierben NA17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback