Aierben NA17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel NA17
MotherboardAierben NA17  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '23 at 13:40
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 73
1-Core 179
2-Core 332
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 832
88% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,315
81% 1,315 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX1060
Device(1B50 551D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1634
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.4% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 40.6
38% 43.4 fps
MRender 32.1
Gravity 44.4
Splatting 42.7
33% 39.7 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S500PRO 512GB
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1759 1489 588 511 531 577 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,156
Write 2,293
Mixed 1,813
SusWrite 909
402% 1,793 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 102
339% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 596
542% 822 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 289%
Great: 302%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 128GB-$37
49GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 23 18 26 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 62.1
Write 24.4
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 20.4
43% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 4.3
224% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 34.8
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 25
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 100%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 29 60 75" 1920 1009 SNYF903 SONY TV *00
Typical NA17 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Aierben NA17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback