Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	122.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171114
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 10 '23 at 14:18
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$1,000 4,653 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 59.3 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 185 62% 112 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 649 62% 512 Pts	64-Core 2,364 146% 2,364 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 95%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$105 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 834GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 463 Write 444 Mixed 418 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 59.3 4K Mixed 53.3 146% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 357 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
HEMA_32G HEMA_32GB 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 25GB free, PID 4300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 16.7 Write 7 Mixed 10.2 13% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 8x16GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 52.6 MC Mixed 32.3 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 8.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 142%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	82x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	72x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	64x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	55x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 85%, 19,774 samples	23x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $1,334

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16