Asus P8H77-V LE

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-V LE (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140317
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 12 '23 at 12:17
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	UZB-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 98.8 2-Core 194 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 318 40% 303 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 84DE) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 17 Parallax 17 15% 17.3 fps	MRender 22.1 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 0.2 10% 13.6 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB 5,700 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN4763 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 6.7 5.1 4.2 4.5 9.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 293 Write 284 Mixed 95.5 SusWrite 9 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 15.7 68% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 28.4 DQ Mixed 21 18% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 432GB free Firmware: MS2OA8A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 128 132 126 133 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 139 Write 102 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 127 70% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 107%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 896GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 129 127 131 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 120 Write 128 Mixed 20.6 SusWrite 126 71% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 16GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.4% Good	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 18.8 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 17.4 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-V LE Builds (Compare 1,272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V LE - $110

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	402x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	128x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	100x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	75x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	26x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	19x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16