Performance Results


Gaming 164% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 167% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Micro-Star MS-7D08
Motherboard	MSI MAG Z590 TORPEDO (MS-7D08) (all builds)
Memory	58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221014
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '23 at 20:48
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900K-$440 107,269 User benchmarks, average bench 100% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 87.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 225 80% 142 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 836 77% 642 Pts	64-Core 1,414 88% 1,414 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$539 45,585 User benchmarks, average bench 190% Palit(1569 F302) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	195% Outstanding	Lighting 274 Reflection 402 Parallax 290 223% 322 fps	MRender 360 Gravity 242 Splatting 192 208% 265 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 205%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 9,880 User benchmarks, average bench 307% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 831 407 103 322 404 391 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Read 1,355 Write 866 Mixed 459 SusWrite 410 171% 772 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 45.2 128% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 432 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 360 270% 363 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 541%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 512GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 368GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 380 384 236 210 125 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 97% Great: 114%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1.5TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 157 162 64 75 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 10 Write 128 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 113 48% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 6.4 807% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 254%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB 2,421 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1.5TB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 129 128 129 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 141 Write 141 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 132 142% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB 5,468 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	94% Outstanding	MC Read 36.2 MC Write 36.7 MC Mixed 29 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 39 SC Mixed 26.3 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 131%

UFO

Desktop 105%

UFO

Workstation 131%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	110x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	65x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	62x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	47x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	43x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	41x

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $702

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16