HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '23 at 10:59
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 179
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 279
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 1315 MHz, MLim: 526 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 4.2
4% 4.1 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5
Splatting 6.4
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 23 27 77 62 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 372
Write 263
Mixed 273
SusWrite 70.9
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 12.6
57% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 38.8
45% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 53%
Zebronics 2.28GB
66GB free
Firmware: VA001CC6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 384 395 339 378 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 372
Write 402
Mixed 338
SusWrite 379
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 31.5
110% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 82.9
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 123
106% 152 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0080 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback