QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive3.07% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime20 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 08:15
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i7-11700
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 18
2-Core 54.6
15% 36.3 Pts
4-Core 91.6
8-Core 148
15% 120 Pts
64-Core 95.8
6% 95.8 Pts
Poor: 29% Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 75GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.8 14 10 5.8 12 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
3.07% Terrible
Read 57
Write 24.7
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 10.7
6% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
0% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 64%
Qemu HARDDISK 27GB
4GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 14 9.7 5.6 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 55.5
Write 23.5
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 10.4
20% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 56%
Qemu HARDDISK 43GB
18GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.6 2 1.9 2.1 2.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 2.3
2% 2.25 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Mixed 0
19% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x6GB
1 of 1 slots used
6GB DIMM RAM
Relative performance n/a - RAM benchmark error
Poor: 23% Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback