Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5105 1,007 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Memory 20.9 1-Core 65.6 2-Core 128 36% 71.6 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 231 31% 231 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,226 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	3.1% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 4.6 4% 4.47 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 0.2 2% 3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.1% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar NM100 256GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN11035 SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 232 319 336 299 342 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 311 Write 279 Mixed 294 SusWrite 308 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 12.1 40% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 190 139% 181 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown WPBH26D416SXA-8G 1x8GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 5.1 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 314 13% 314 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	73x
Celeron N5105IntelBench 37%, 1,007 samples	23x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	73x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	23x

RAM
WPBH26D416SXA-8G 1x8GBUnknownBench 37%, 81 samples	54x
WPBH26D416SXA-8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 73%, 33 samples	10x
BL8G26C16S4B.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 77%, 76 samples	3x