Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5105 1,007 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Memory 26.1 1-Core 72.6 2-Core 143 41% 80.7 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 226 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,226 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4 Parallax 4.8 4% 4.4 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 7.4 5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar NM100 256GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN11035 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 212 312 288 321 297 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 322 Write 297 Mixed 305 SusWrite 288 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 13.3 44% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 209 153% 197 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown WPBH26D416SXA-8G 1x8GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.3% Poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 6.5 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 278 14% 278 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	60	39	60	24.1"	1536 960	NEC68D7 EA244WMi

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	73x
Celeron N5105IntelBench 37%, 1,007 samples	23x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	73x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	23x

RAM
WPBH26D416SXA-8G 1x8GBUnknownBench 37%, 81 samples	54x
WPBH26D416SXA-8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 73%, 33 samples	10x
BL8G26C16S4B.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 77%, 76 samples	3x