Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1135G7 36,962 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.8% Average	Memory 12.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 222 60% 123 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 547 59% 469 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sanyo(144D C195) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Lighting 15.7 Reflection 12.3 Parallax 17.6 13% 15.2 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 20.2 Splatting 0.2 8% 10.8 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000 256GB 724 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV70K0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 107 103 104 108 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 700 Write 139 Mixed 192 SusWrite 107 62% 284 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 19.8 68% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 168 130% 180 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 162%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	24.1% Poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 7.2 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 3.1 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 378 11% 378 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	954x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	513x
GeForce MX450NvidiaBench 29%, 1,913 samples	13x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-000 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 724 samples	511x
CL1-8D256 256GBSsstcBench 130%, 516 samples	171x
MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GBSamsungBench 152%, 710 samples	88x