Micro UM690

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive397% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMicro UM690  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BFC
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '23 at 18:35
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 71.6
1-Core 176
2-Core 350
103% 199 Pts
4-Core 674
8-Core 1,068
107% 871 Pts
64-Core 1,343
83% 1,343 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 1681) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.10.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 77.4
34% 57.8 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 45.9
Splatting 56.1
36% 42.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2710 2982 3062 3297 2394 284 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 2437
Write 3,276
Mixed 2,178
SusWrite 2,455
585% 2,586 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 80
333% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,280
DQ Write 893
DQ Mixed 1,197
864% 1,124 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 397%
Great: 399%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD5S480016G-B 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 35.2
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 24.9
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UM690 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Micro UM690

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback