Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140801
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '23 at 18:44
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51 10,924 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Memory 21.7 1-Core 25.2 2-Core 44.2 18% 30.4 Pts	4-Core 55 8-Core 58.5 8% 56.8 Pts	64-Core 48.1 3% 48.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% MSI(1462 8A91) CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.5.2 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	21.5% Poor	Lighting 25.9 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 36.3 21% 30 fps	MRender 27.1 Gravity 30.2 Splatting 25.3 22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 102 146 106 113 158 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.6% Poor	Read 187 Write 191 Mixed 168 SusWrite 122 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 0.3 24% 9.1 MB/s	DQ Read 81.2 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 97.8 74% 97.1 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 92%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB 13,068 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 143GB free Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 67 78 75 83 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 88.6 Write 46.7 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 77.9 47% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 53%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 118 141 133 149 166 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 169 Write 163 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 140 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 12GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	16% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 6.9 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 5.4 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 308 13% 308 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	21x
A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples	17x
A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples	11x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	18x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	12x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16