Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82B4
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 11:44
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 178
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 335
39% 302 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T400 4GB
HP(103C 1613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.25
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 19.3
16% 20.9 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 21.8
18% 22 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VTP256S1SSD 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1102A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 11 124 55 31 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 330
Write 333
Mixed 202
SusWrite 56.8
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 10.3
36% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 46.5
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 16.5
16% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-119.A00G 9905702-427.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 1,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback