Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardOEM
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '23 at 02:18
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 55.5
1-Core 75
2-Core 129
50% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 141
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 0A16) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 3.9
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 32 48 55 55 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 430
Write 93.4
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 47.6
32% 150 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 1.3
49% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 46.6
DQ Mixed 1.5
23% 58 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 93%
SDHC Card 32GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 64
Write 17
Mixed 17.7
33% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
45% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.8
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback