bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory53.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 21:22
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 174
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 511
50% 410 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 20.6
18% 20.2 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 199 196 203 194 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 429
Write 330
Mixed 309
SusWrite 219
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 29.8
104% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 147
140% 214 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 97%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
88GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 214 214 219 213 217 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.1% Above average
Read 242
Write 241
Mixed 213
SusWrite 219
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 25.1
84% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 152
122% 170 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 97%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
5GB free
Firmware: MU01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 245
Write 240
Mixed 212
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 25.1
84% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 144
119% 170 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x46332D3132383030434C31302D3847425A 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 28.6
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.2
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback