Lenovo 82MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82MD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230310
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 04 '23 at 17:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 62.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 257
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 444
57% 429 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 20.6
14% 16.6 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 1
6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-4D256 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BS262
SusWrite @10s intervals: 734 336 181 141 165 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,685
Write 1,141
Mixed 944
SusWrite 293
225% 1,016 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 22.6
135% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 464
435% 667 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 159%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82MD Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback