ADD TO PC
BUILD

Geekom MiniAir 11

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Geekom MiniAir 11 (all builds)
Motherboard	GEEKOM MiniAir 11
Memory	1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220617
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '23 at 15:55
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5095 1,699 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	37% Below average	Memory 44.4 1-Core 67 2-Core 128 44% 79.7 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 210 24% 187 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.19% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3 Parallax 2.6 2% 2.67 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 3.6 3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.19% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Np830 256GB 256GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 167% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0521A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 172 102 158 102 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 627 Write 425 Mixed 492 SusWrite 184 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 10.2 42% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 184 145% 201 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 215%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 2TB 858 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 40GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3 2.7 3.1 1.8 1.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 35.7 Mixed 26 SusWrite 2.9 18% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 117GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 21 19 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 35.9 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 20.5 21% 28 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 67%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 2TB 858 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 5.6 5.8 6.9 5.5 6.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 33.2 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 6.2 17% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 109%
Samsung M3 Portable 1.5TB 360 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 120GB free, PID 61b4 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 32.9 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 11.7 34% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown WPBH26D416SXA-8G 1x8GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 9.2 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.3 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MiniAir 11 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Geekom MiniAir 11

CPU
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	73x
Celeron N5105IntelBench 37%, 1,007 samples	23x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	73x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	23x

SSD
NM100 256GBLexarBench 65%, 49 samples	43x
256GB 256GBNf830Bench 54%, 29 samples	23x
NM100 512GBLexarBench 76%, 25 samples	9x

RAM
WPBH26D416SXA-8G 1x8GBUnknownBench 37%, 81 samples	54x
WPBH26D416SXA-8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 73%, 33 samples	10x
BL8G26C16S4B.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 77%, 76 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback