Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Virtuozzo OpenStack Compute (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '23 at 15:39
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core (Broadwell, IBRS) 27 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Memory 56.4 1-Core 34.4 2-Core 74.6 35% 55.1 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 375 32% 275 Pts	64-Core 654 40% 654 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 69%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 4.5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 4TB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 70 82 78 89 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.6% Very poor	Read 115 Write 54.2 Mixed 88.9 SusWrite 73 18% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 3 12% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 13%
Qemu HARDDISK 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 83 83 89 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.4% Above average	Read 108 Write 53.1 Mixed 88.5 SusWrite 83.7 62% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.4 478% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Virtuozzo 4x16GB 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM RAM Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.1% Above average	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 17.7 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16