Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive693% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 17:19
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$285
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 85.6
1-Core 223
2-Core 446
130% 251 Pts
4-Core 892
8-Core 1677
153% 1,285 Pts
64-Core 3,160
196% 3,160 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 126%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
PNY(196E 13A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 163
Parallax 152
136% 160 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 132
Splatting 114
112% 141 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 122%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4430 4617 4944 5067 4988 5019 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
693% Outstanding
Read 4,538
Write 5,006
Mixed 3,501
SusWrite 4,844
1,009% 4,472 MB/s
4K Read 86.3
4K Write 298
4K Mixed 112
432% 165 MB/s
DQ Read 2,118
DQ Write 1,654
DQ Mixed 1,896
1,416% 1,889 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 693%
Great: 666%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
931GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3087 3156 3155 2754 1737 1738 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
472% Outstanding
Read 2,798
Write 3072
Mixed 3,038
SusWrite 2,604
650% 2,878 MB/s
4K Read 79.7
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 116
388% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 2,021
DQ Write 1,595
DQ Mixed 1,786
1,343% 1,801 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 472%
Great: 477%
WDC WD180EDGZ-11B2DA0 18TB
4TB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 143 146 147 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 146
Write 149
Mixed 103
SusWrite 147
31% 136 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 2.4
20% 6.57 MB/s
DQ Read 4.8
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 4.2
4% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 28%
WDC WD180EDGZ-11B2DA0 18TB
11TB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 154 154 156 157 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 159
Write 152
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 154
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 3.5
19% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 28%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
611GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 97 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 52.4
Write 104
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 99.5
108% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
46% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK01 14TB
418GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 182 183 187 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 172
Mixed 180
SusWrite 183
248% 182 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 1.1
538% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 2.7
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 1
459% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B6400C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
210% Outstanding
MC Read 84.7
MC Write 84.4
MC Mixed 79.9
237% 83 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 52
SC Mixed 37.6
111% 38.7 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 148%
This bench: 210%
Great: 230%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
61% 19% 109 510 460 165 27.2" 2560 1440 GSM5C4D LG ULTRAGEAR
History: Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B | Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 9,446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $1,564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback