Today's hottest deals

Samsung 955XED

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 955XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP955XED-KA1UK
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230420
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '24 at 20:48
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 62.4
1-Core 172
2-Core 302
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 896
90% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,191
74% 1,191 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1C5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3616
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 14.9
11% 16.2 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 16.4
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2256HCHQ-00B 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7FK2Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,804
Write 2,555
Mixed 2,238
564% 2,532 MB/s
4K Read 76.3
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 102
332% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,224
DQ Write 978
DQ Mixed 1,108
827% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 180% Great: 351%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
536GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 109 109 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 124
Write 111
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 110
139% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.7
295% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
136% Outstanding
MC Read 58
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 51.7
152% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 22.8
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 136%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 2R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 13% 15 209 56 0 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4159
Typical 955XED Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 955XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback