Siemens SIMATIC Field PG M4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSiemens SIMATIC Field PG M4  (all builds)
MotherboardSIEMENS A5E03649102
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '23 at 16:50
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
PGA998B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50% Average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 143
57% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 180
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Intel(8086 0166) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.83 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 318 210 300 235 360 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 427
Write 385
Mixed 250
SusWrite 288
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 28.3
94% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 239
186% 258 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SGN08G64B6BB2SA-DC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 4% 74 24 20 60 15.5" 1920 1080 CMN15B1
Typical SIMATIC Field PG M4 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Siemens SIMATIC Field PG M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback