HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '23 at 22:03
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 140 60% 99 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 262 34% 255 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.61 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.7% Poor	Lighting 34.7 Reflection 37.7 Parallax 36.3 28% 36.2 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 36.4 Splatting 25.7 27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB 3,003 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR061 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 201 216 222 230 222 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.7% Below average	Read 233 Write 189 Mixed 95.4 SusWrite 210 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 49.5 4K Mixed 0.2 52% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 16.4 DQ Write 21.3 DQ Mixed 0.2 5% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 81%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB 3,461 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 59GB free Firmware: SBFMP1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 90 88 130 23 117 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.4% Average	Read 244 Write 170 Mixed 205 SusWrite 78.5 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 21 84% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 115 107% 164 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 90%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 274GB free Firmware: 0003SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 104 104 105 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 103 Write 103 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 104 64% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 99U5471-052.A00LF ID:01 98 99U5471-052.A00LF 52GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 8192, 8192, 36864 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.8% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 14.2 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	120	24"	1280 720	IVM6126 PLG2488H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	198x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	159x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	99x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	11x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16