Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive687% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory51.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 13:28
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$445
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 75.7
1-Core 212
2-Core 424
121% 237 Pts
4-Core 823
8-Core 1,632
145% 1,227 Pts
64-Core 3,734
231% 3,734 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8877) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.46
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 12.5
6% 9.5 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 17.1
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11117 10875 5141 3236 3181 3208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
687% Outstanding
Read 3,459
Write 8,988
Mixed 2,453
SusWrite 6,126
1,198% 5,257 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 333
4K Mixed 91.2
368% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 1,478
DQ Write 1367
DQ Mixed 1,420
1,066% 1,422 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 687%
Great: 499%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C36-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
147% Outstanding
MC Read 58.7
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 51.1
150% 52.4 GB/s
SC Read 54.2
SC Write 57.7
SC Mixed 46.2
151% 52.7 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 147%
This bench: 147%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 31.5" 2560 1440 AUS32A7 VP32UQ
Typical PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $2,070
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback