bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory247.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2558 x 1360 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 10:23
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6248R
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 49.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
66% 126 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 858
76% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,984
123% 1,984 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID RTX6000-24Q
Nvidia(10DE 132C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 474.44
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
156% Outstanding
Lighting 204
Reflection 200
Parallax 220
166% 208 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 218
Splatting 183
178% 223 fps
Poor: 156%
This bench: 156%
Great: 159%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 275GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 432 448 437 441 385 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 571
Write 452
Mixed 538
SusWrite 430
112% 498 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 16.6
61% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 21
DQ Mixed 21.1
17% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 16x16GB
16 of 128 slots used
256GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 34
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 12.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 196%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback