Foxconn P35

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemFoxconn P35  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn P35A01
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 15:07
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$15
SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 28.1
2-Core 35.9
31% 42.2 Pts
4-Core 38
8-Core 41.7
5% 39.8 Pts
64-Core 38.3
2% 38.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Palit(1569 0F00) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 1
3% 3.43 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.7
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 195
Write 196
Mixed 177
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 24.9
81% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 139
100% 129 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 113%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB
449GB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 89 91 98 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 145
Write 64.9
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 91.5
20% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
6% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 20%
Toshiba HDWD260 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 85 85 92 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 148
Write 150
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 86.2
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.6
239% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 105%
Lexar CFUDMASD 2GB
1GB free, PID b035
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 12.3
Write 4.5
Mixed 5.2
8% 7.33 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 20.1" 1280 720 PHL0842 Philips 200WB
Typical P35 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Foxconn P35

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback