MSI MS-158P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 15 B7ED
MotherboardMSI MS-158P  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '23 at 01:41
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 54.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 246
72% 139 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 811
73% 616 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 680M
MSI(1462 13DF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.56
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 40.9
18% 39.5 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 21.3
19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,052
Write 1,990
Mixed 1,630
422% 1,891 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 71.1
237% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 612
417% 517 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 48.4
MC Mixed 39.1
123% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 47.3
SC Mixed 29.8
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 115%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical MS-158P Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-158P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback