Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-55  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Evoque_ADH
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220413
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:28
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 66.7
1-Core 171
2-Core 355
101% 197 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 1,149
110% 905 Pts
64-Core 1,954
121% 1,954 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 1598) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1029
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 28
Parallax 28.2
20% 27 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 37
Splatting 21.9
22% 28 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
620GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,616
Write 3,594
Mixed 2,331
708% 3,180 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 83.1
287% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,074
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 941
712% 960 MB/s
Poor: 196% Great: 540%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 37.7
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 21.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0AD1
Typical Predator PH315-55 Builds (Compare 1,705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Acer Predator PH315-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback