Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory53.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150930
Uptime31.3 Days
Run DateDec 23 '17 at 16:38
Run Duration492 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$150
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 211
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 652
67% 540 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
HP(103C 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 52.5
Reflection 53.3
Parallax 70.9
43% 58.9 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 45
Splatting 39.3
40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 503
Write 445
Mixed 506
108% 485 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 11.1
75% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 13.2
53% 109 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76%
Great: 111%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 152
Mixed 145
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.46
111% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 138
Write 77.5
Mixed 158
95% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.28
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
1TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 133
Write 132
Mixed 138
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.34
98% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
1TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 128
Write 112
Mixed 121
91% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.35
98% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
862GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 121
Write 127
Mixed 130
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.45
107% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
349GB free
Firmware: 1402
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 107
Write 138
Mixed 95.7
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.23
66% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 64%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
471GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 63
Write 96.7
Mixed 73.6
105% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.17
75% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 42%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
380GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 69.3
Write 70.7
Mixed 70.3
91% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.22
64% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
314GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 64.6
Write 63.1
Mixed 58.9
80% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.19
63% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
304GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 64.9
Write 64
Mixed 52.5
77% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.24
74% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 1TB
243GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 84.8
Mixed 54.3
90% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.23
72% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 2TB
134GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 82.3
Write 92.5
Mixed 69.2
105% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.18
69% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
23GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 57.1
Write 61.4
Mixed 51.7
73% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.21
61% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
113% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 45.1
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 21.7
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $700
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback