Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B660M MORTAR MAX WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D97)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D97
MotherboardMSI MAG B660M MORTAR MAX WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D97)  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '23 at 22:58
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$136
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 73.3
1-Core 162
2-Core 308
96% 181 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 942
90% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
MSI(1462 7D97) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 7.7
6% 9.03 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 9.7
8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,909
Write 2,668
Mixed 1,932
557% 2,503 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 65.2
256% 99.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,906
DQ Write 1,290
DQ Mixed 1,245
1,024% 1,480 MB/s
Poor: 249% Great: 623%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 22
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 27" 2560 1364 DEL41B0 DELL U2720Q
Typical MAG B660M MORTAR MAX WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D97) Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B660M MORTAR MAX WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D97)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback